<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Atlantic - Latest Comments in No carbon shall escape my sight</title><link>http://theatlantic.disqus.com/</link><description>The Atlantic Website</description><atom:link href="http://theatlantic.disqus.com/no_carbon_shall_escape_my_sight/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:08:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: No carbon shall escape my sight</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2008/08/no-carbon-shall-escape-my-sight/5576#comment-36541721</link><description>&lt;p&gt;what a perfect historical-political moment for this to come out! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:08:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No carbon shall escape my sight</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2008/08/no-carbon-shall-escape-my-sight/5576#comment-36541720</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@G.D. Cold-blooded murder has practical advantages, depending on your perspective.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I felt pointing to the practical disadvantages was a dilution of the point of US Army hypocrisy that you were making.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael O&amp;apos;Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:46:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No carbon shall escape my sight</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2008/08/no-carbon-shall-escape-my-sight/5576#comment-36541717</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michael: Which practical advantages? The only one I can think of is the cheap labor from slavery (a HUGE economic leg-up for the U.S.), but slavery was inherently unstable. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">G.D.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:25:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No carbon shall escape my sight</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2008/08/no-carbon-shall-escape-my-sight/5576#comment-36541715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know how to get comedy central videos to work in Canada?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Bank</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:22:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No carbon shall escape my sight</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2008/08/no-carbon-shall-escape-my-sight/5576#comment-36541713</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@G.D. You do encourage me to want to read the book.  Do we really care how many "practical disadvantages" there are?  Doesn't that just open up the door to weiging them against the practical advantages?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael O&amp;apos;Neill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:17:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No carbon shall escape my sight</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2008/08/no-carbon-shall-escape-my-sight/5576#comment-36541711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the things that struck me about Koerner's book was how schizophrenic the U.S. Army was in regard to its own policy of segregation. They made a point to instruct black G.I.'s not to discuss the Army's racial stratification with the people in Burma and India, lest Axis spies learn of it and use  it to sow weakness. But they were still doggedly committed to enforcing segregation. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yet another example of the practical disadvantages of institutional racism. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">G.D.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:25:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
