<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Atlantic - Latest Comments in More Thoughts On Arlen Specter</title><link>http://theatlantic.disqus.com/</link><description>The Atlantic Website</description><atom:link href="http://theatlantic.disqus.com/more_thoughts_on_arlen_specter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:44:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: More Thoughts On Arlen Specter</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2009/04/more-thoughts-on-arlen-specter/16804#comment-36667522</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For what it is worth, I saw this diary on KOS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank You Hillary, For 60 In The Senate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/4/28/725620/-Thank-You-Hillary,-For-60-In-The-Senate." rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/4/28/725620/-Thank-You-Hillary,-For-60-In-The-Senate.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AnotherBlackChad</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:44:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Thoughts On Arlen Specter</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2009/04/more-thoughts-on-arlen-specter/16804#comment-36667520</link><description>&lt;p&gt;THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!!! FOR KARL ROVE'S PERMANENT MAJORITY!!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seriously, all that's left now is that little sh!t to get on TV talking about how "we've got 'em right where we want 'em".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dragnet</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:12:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Thoughts On Arlen Specter</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2009/04/more-thoughts-on-arlen-specter/16804#comment-36667518</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Eagles got their good news last Saturday when they drafter Shady McCoy.  Of course, I'm a Pitt alum, so I may be biased.  Still, it was a good pickup for them and thus excellent news.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder if anyone's gonna challenge Toomey now?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shawn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:01:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Thoughts On Arlen Specter</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2009/04/more-thoughts-on-arlen-specter/16804#comment-36667517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Digby: "If you want to enjoy this watch Fox news. They all look like they've just sucked on a bag of lemons." Excellent news.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CitizenE</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:50:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Thoughts On Arlen Specter</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2009/04/more-thoughts-on-arlen-specter/16804#comment-36667515</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't read TPM often, so I missed the joke to some extent. Err rather, I thought the joke was about Hillary running for that Senate seat as the "little girl from Scranton"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Thoughts On Arlen Specter</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2009/04/more-thoughts-on-arlen-specter/16804#comment-36667513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its one of those internet tradition sort of jokes.  Back during the Democratic primaries,  it was common for pundits who had a vested interest in prolonging the race to interpret all sorts of relatively meaningless data as good news for hillary.  They often did the same for Guiliani.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;This went well past the point of absurdity and there was a blog commenter,  named idiotic I believe,  who posted at TPM a lot who would ridicule this media tendency by pointing out, even at times when the news was unambiguously in Obama's favor that it was excellent news for Hillary.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;People started to pick this up and made an internet tradition out of it in various ways.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:44:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Thoughts On Arlen Specter</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2009/04/more-thoughts-on-arlen-specter/16804#comment-36667512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My speculation, though I am as in the dark about this as burnstony, is that this sounds to me, mmmn, smells like EXCELLENT NEWS!!!! FROM RUSH LIMBAUGH!!!!!--cigar smoke and mirrors with half a brain tied behind his back--the inCONTINent oxy-moron nation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!!! FOR THE PITTSBURGH STEELERS!! The Eagles, perhaps, or not so much?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CitizenE</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:40:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Thoughts On Arlen Specter</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2009/04/more-thoughts-on-arlen-specter/16804#comment-36667511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why for Hillary - I am often confused by Coates post - can someone explain this post &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">burnstony</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:30:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Thoughts On Arlen Specter</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2009/04/more-thoughts-on-arlen-specter/16804#comment-36667510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome-Sauce.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!!! FOR DICK CHENEY!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ta-Nehisi Coates</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:30:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Thoughts On Arlen Specter</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2009/04/more-thoughts-on-arlen-specter/16804#comment-36667509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!!! FOR MICHAEL STEELE!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That has to make you feel a little better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tom c</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:29:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
